foxy chick pleasures twat and gets licked and plowed in pov.sex kamerki
sampling a tough cock. fsiblog
free porn

Some terracotta figurines from Lebanon in the Museo Arqueológico Nacional, Madrid

0

Some terracotta figurines from Lebanon in the Museo Arqueológico Nacional, Madrid

تماثيل الطين من لبنان في المتحف الأثري الوطني، مدريد

 

 سماح حيدر شاهينSamah Haidar Chahine)[1] (

 

              تاريخ الإرسال:3-2-2024                                تاريخ القبول:15-2-2024

تحميل نسخة PDF

 سماح حيدر شاهينAbstract

This paper investigates five skeptical figurines from the private collection of Tomas de Asensi y Lugar, in the collection of the National Archeological Museum in Madrid. Asensi marked the location where he purchased these figurines in his manuscript and specifies them from Lebanon. The examination of these figurines is classified typological as ˮbanqueterˮ. The aim of this study is to present as possible the production center, origin and the meaning within the socio-cultural context with a wide range of iconographical and stylistically comparisons from local, Greek and Near East models.

Key words

Figurines, female, banqueter, mitra, polos, Greek, Near East figurines, Hellenistic period.

ملخص

هذا المقال دراسة لعدد من الدّمى الطينيّة ضمن المجموعة الخاصة “لتوماس دي أسينسي إي لوغار”، الموجودة ضمن مجموعة المتحف الأثري الوطني في مدريد. حدد أسينسي المكان الذي ابتاع هذه الدّمى الطينيّة في مخطوطته على أنّها من لبنان. الهدف من هذه الدّراسة هو محاولة لتقديم مركز إنتاج هذه الدمى قدر الإمكان ضمن السياق الاجتماعي والثقافي، والايقونغرافي وذلك من خلال مقابلتها ومقارنتها مع مجموعة واسعة من النّماذج المحليّة واليونانيّة ومن مراكز الشّرق الأدنى.

الكلمات المفاتيح: تماثيل صغيرة، أنثى، مأدبة، ميترا، لعبة البولو، اليونانيّة، تماثيل الشرق الأدنى، الفترة الهلنستية

 

Introduction:

The terracotta figurines addressed in this article form a part of the collection of antiquities in National Archeological Museum in Madrid which originates from the private collection of Tomas de Asesni y lugar. Asesni noted in his book seven Egyptian coroplastic terra-cotta figurines from the Phoenician city of Beirut1; whereas only five of these pieces are mentioned in this study.  These five figurines are homogenous in their typology of  figurines portraying a reclining female banqueter (Nos 1-5, Figs. 1-5), and can be assigned to a period that ranges between first to second century B.C.; A brief summary of Asensi’s aspects of life will be helpful to better understanding for his collection.

Tomas de Asensi y lugar

 Tomas de Asensi y lugar was born in Algeria in February 18112, and died around 18753.

He was well educated man and proficient in many languages as he was also familiar with many science and humanities Asensi was introduced to the diplomatic career by his father, who trained him to function as a chancellor in Algiers – After that and during his life career, Tomas Asensi vacant multiple positions from 1836 to 1843 as he was appointed vice-consulin in Genoa Nice and consul of Elsener and Cette. In 1848 he was appointed Consul general to the Minister of state in Madrid and then in 1854 as deputy director of the commerce in Spain, until he was the director of commerce in Spain (1855). During his career as director of Commerce and consul he had some trades and collected archaeological pieces, his collection was exceptional because of the catalogue dated to 1875 by Asensi himself.4 this catalogue included the origin, subject, measurements, description for the pieces in addition to ink drawings showing details of the objects. The collection was divided into categories (architecture and ceramics, terracotta figurines, etc.) and from different places like Asia (Persia, India, Palestine, and turkey), Africa (Egypt, Morocco, Algeria, and Tripoli, Sierra Leone) and from America.

After Asensi’s death and due to financial issues his widow Maria Del Rosario de Laiglesia, offered the Asensi antique collection which composed of 13205 to the state in 18766 and acquired to the National Archeological Museum in Madrid.

Catalogue

The catalogue embraces five terracotta figurines presented according to their typology. Each catalogue enters with paper catalogue number, the inv. museum number, measurements which are given in centimeters and in general are the maximum height (H), width (W), and thickness, as well to the color, condition and bibliography followed by a description. This catalogue was made by the aid of the catalogues by Laumonier (1921) and Pons (1997).

 

Type: Reclining Female.

No 1. inv. no: MAN 3190 (Fig. 1)

Dimension: H: 18 cm, W: 9 cm; thickness: 3.8 cm.

Color: Umber7 in color or whitish gray8 clay.  

Condition: Hollowed poor neglected model, blurred. The back is flat.

Date: First to second century B.C.

Bibliography: Laumonier 1921: 112, no 560; Pons 1997: 108, no 25; Rada y Delgado 1883: 250.

Fig. 1: Reclining woman with oriental coiffeur. Photo by: Angel Martinez Cams (Museo Arqueológico Nacional – Resultados de la búsqueda (mcu.es)

Description: A fully clothed female lies upon a very thin and low couch.  She reclines in frontal position supporting herself on her left side. The face and torso are hardly defined. Her upper body is leaning to the left, while the head is tilting to the right.  The legs are stretched one above the other, her right leg lies upon the left one. Her right arm extents and rests on the right thigh while the fore arm bents inward. The left elbow and forearm rests on a cushion9, a cup is seen in her left hand10. She wears a long chiton from which the feet protrude, were the uppermost left ankle is raised upward on the right ankle forming a fish tail form; she is probably wearing shoes. The himation pulled over the high oriental conical coiffeur and acts like a veil and falls around her torso, then wraps tight around her limbs. No signs for the folding for the himation.

No 2. inv. no: MAN 384711 (Fig. 3)

Dimension: H: 7.2 cm; W: 8.5 cm; thickness: 2.1 cm.

Color: Yellow12 in color or white 13.

Condition: Hollowed and blurred. The back is flat.

Date: First to second century B.C.

Bibliography: Laumonier 1921: 112, no 563; Pons 1997: 107, no 21;

                              Fig. 2: Reclining female with polos

Description: Female in frontal position reclines on her left side on a low couch, supporting herself on a cushion. The upper body is lifted to an almost perfectly straight position.  The legs slightly bend and the knees are somewhat forward. Her right hand stretches along her right side. The left elbow rests on the cushion while the forearm slightly rises holding a cup against her body.

Her face is ovoid.  The eyes, nose and mouth are identified, the chin is round, and the anatomy especially the breast can be clearly seen. She wears a V-neck, long chiton from which the feet protrude. On her head she wears wide and low polos and a beaded diadem with a himation framing her face.

No 3. inv. no: MAN 3848 (Fig. 4)

Dimension: H: 9 cm; W: 11.4 cm; thickness: 3.8 cm.

Color: Yellowish14 in color.

Condition: Hollowed. No vent hole. blurred model, covered with whitish grey crust. The back is flat.

Date: First to second century B.C.

Bibliography: Laumonier 1921: 112, no 561; Pons 1997: 108, no 23; Iàm . LI, no 2.

 

Fig. 3: Reclining woman with high oriental coiffure.

 

Description: Female banqueter in frontal position reclines on her left side upon a thick couch, supporting herself on a cushion, the upper body is straight. The left leg is extending while the right leg is seen in profile and bended at the knee upward. Her right elbow rests on the right hip and the forearm extents inward, while the left elbow and forearm rests on a cushion. She holds an object in her left hand possibly a cup.

The face is ovoid; the eyes, nose and mouth are not identified, the chin is pointed. She wears a long chiton with V- neck. The feet protrude from the chiton. A himation pulled over her high conical cap which has a carved peak probably linked to a Persian style, draped over the left and right shoulders framing the upper body and arms and wrapping her lower body. The coiffeur is indistinct.

 

No 4. inv.  no: MAN 3850 (Figs. 5-6)

Dimension: H: 7.7 cm; W: 10.8 cm; thickness: 2.4 cm.

Color: Yellowish in color15; greyish Traces of red color on the feet16.

Condition: Without vent hole. The back is flat.

Date: First to second century B.C.

Bibliography: Laumonier 1921: 112, no 564, Pl. LI, no 1; Pons 1997: 108, no 24; Iàm. LI, no 1.

Fig. 4: Reclining woman with mitra and conical cap.

Description: Female banqueter reclining in frontal position on her left side, with her upper body propped upright by the left arm supporting her body on her left bended elbow.  Her head is slightly tilted to the left. The legs are slightly bended with the knees forward; the feet are high. Her extended right arm rests on the right side grasping the border of the himation in her right hand. While she holds in her left hand an object probably a cup17 or patera18 against her body.

Her face is ovoid, the nose is wide, the mouth is small with thin lips and the chin is round; the anatomy of the breast can be clearly seen. She wears a long chiton with échancrée neck and a himation framing her face and apparently pulled over her headdress then fastened over the shoulders. She grips the side of the himation in her right hand thus thick horizontal folds is grasped below the hand, then the himation falls to the feet in thin folds. A belt can be seen under the breast. She wears a necklace and earrings. The hair is found as puffs over the ears and below the conical cap and sorts as a tuft under the head-band mitra19 which ends with a boucle on each side 20. she is must probably wearing shoes.

No 5. inv.  no: MAN: 384921 (Fig. 7)

Dimension: H: 6.8 cm; W: 13 cm; thickness: 3.6 cm.

Color: Reddish22 in color.

Condition: hollowed; The head, right shoulder and half of upper torso are missing. The rest of the body is cracked. The back is flat.

Date: First to second century B.C.

Bibliography: Laumonier 1921: 112, no 562; Pons 1997: 107, no 22;

Fig. 5: Reclining woman.

Description: fragment of the lower body of female banqueter, the upper body along with the head are missing. She is in reclining position on her left side upon a low couch; a thin cushion can be identified. The legs are bent together at the knee. Her right hand rests along the right side. In her left hand she holds a patera23 against her body. She wears a long chiton from which the feet protrude, and most probably a himation which wraps her limbs tight thus no folds can be recognized.

 

Analysis:

This group constitutes one of the most common themes in coroplastic art: the banqueters 24. The figures are almost eroded and it’s nearly impossible to define some facial features or hairdos, nonetheless we can outline some anatomical features as the breasts which are clearly emphasized in cat. nos 2,5.  Despite that they are unified in gender and clothes (long Greek chiton with himation), they are roughly similar in their general pose. The treatment of some elements such as the posture of the upper body, the position of the legs and feet, hairdos, headpieces as well as furniture show diversity of prototypes and molds used in production.

Stylistically, in general composition, according to the gender, clothing and occasionally headpieces, these figurines are extensively documented in the coroplastic art in Hellenistic Mesopotamia were reclining banqueters are exclusively depicted as females25. While the comparison on the posture and position of the legs suggest influences from different coroplastic centers.

The tilted upper bodies with extended legs and feet like fish tail as per cat. no 1 (Fig. 1) recalls the posture of figurines from Babylon; case in point the nude figure in Louvre Museum26. Another version of the titled upper body position yet the right leg is extended forge ahead the l. leg as in cat. no 4 (Fig. 5) reminiscent of those of alabaster figurine from Parthian Mesopotamia especially were no couches and cushions are added to the scene 27. The combination of frontal position of the upper body with straight and almost horizontal line on the shoulders along with the r. leg bended upward at the knee (Fig. 4), is unusual in Mesopotamia (the upper body is usually in third quarter posture) on the other hand this posture is widely detected on male banqueters from Taranto between 6th to 4th century B.C28; while the frontal position with extended legs slightly bent at the knees (Fig. 3),  similar to those from Aegean islands like Imbros and from  Eleonte29 ; while in cat. no 5 (Fig. 7), the upper body is missing but the position of the legs bending together at the knees, which prompts the style from Samos example the commissioner’s figure30.

The position of the right hand constantly seen prolonging above the right leg whiles the left elbow always bending and resting on a cushion except for cat. no 4 (Fig. 6). The left forearm sometimes rises up to the chest as in cat. nos 2, 4 (Figs. 3,5) or extends straight but in both cases holding different objects cat. nos 1, 3, 5 (Figs. 1,4,7). The furniture and attributes varies from one figure to another, thus the low couches differ in style from thin to thick mattresses, with cushion on the left side, except of one figurine (Figs. 5-6) where no couch is added to the figure. The attributes are confined with patera and cups.

The styles of the hair are undistinguished in most cases except in cat. no 4 (Figs. 5-6) which follows a Greek hairstyle, whereas in cat. no1 (Fig. 1) the hairdo follows the oriental hairstyle with possible turban under the himation and though this style is not widely spread, it is attested on a stela on display in the National Museum of Beirut from Qartaba 31.

Generally Greek men and women wore no headdresses32 and yet the headdress was not a quotidian item33 however the Asensi female reclining figurines are all veiled in himation which pulled over different headpieces. the low beaded polos in Greek style (Fig. 3), was the common headdress of banqueters and was worn by both male and female banqueters34, one of which a figurine from Corinth is said to be female banqueter35, it represents a reclining female, wearing a light chiton and polos on her head, and holds a phiale in her left hand; and it is referred as Aphrodite and derived from Babylonian Astarte. Another female figurine from Babylon and now in the Pennsylvania Museum of Archaeology and Anthropology (B 9122)36 represents a reclining female lying on top of a low couch, wearing long light chiton and himation with polos on her head. The conical cap with carved peak (similar to Kybrasia which is a Persian style37 (Fig. 4) is comparable to one fully draped female banqueter wearing a pointed cap (Kyrbasia) with curved peak on her head from Seleucia (no 687)38, whereas the turban with a himation pulled over the head is attested locally and reminds us with the portraits from Palmyra. The conical cap like the pileus was worn in ancient Greek and varies in form amongst the different nations by whom it was adopted39 along with the mitra, which is originated as a Near Eastern headband 40 (Figs. 5-6).

Another version of same theme is known41 from Tripoli – Lebanon and now on display in the collection of The American University of Beirut Archaeological Museum. What is interesting of this figurine lies not only in its singularity as the only known example of the banqueter type known in Lebanon, but also its gender as male, and the treatment of the posture and the position of the right arm which is now curved inward, furthermore the attributes in both hands: a rhyton in the right hand, and possibly a pet in the left one. However, this statuette does not provide us with further information concerning female banqueters except that banqueter theme was not confined with female gender but also as male figures, following the majority of Greek models, which are usually depicted as males 42.

In comparison with other pieces apparent from Lebanon was a terra-cotta figurine collected by Dosseur, Fernand-Henri and Darasse-Dosseur, Marie and now held by Louvre Museum, Department of Oriental Antiquities (AO 1584)43 however not exposed; This figurine dated back to 800-500. The uniqueness of this piece is that it illustrates a reclining woman stretched on a high banquet in frontal position on a high bed; both legs extended above each other while her right hand stretched over the right leg; while the other is bended resting the elbow on a cushion while holding an object or a pet in her hand. The face is in frontal position but eroded; we can still see traces earring in front the hair which falls down to the shoulders.  in front her legs a child also reclining and tilting to the left supporting his weight on the left elbow. Double reclining figures is not an outlandish motif as it is attested on sarcophagi from Lebanon as the limestone sarcophagus from Déde.

One more alabaster figurine was discovered in Phoenicia 305-224 B.C. held now by Louvre Museum but not exposed (AO 24597)44 also demonstrates a reclining woman with feminine features and pleated himation. Most probably wearing a long sleeve dress. The body is in a frontal position. The right feet are bended upward at the level of the knee while the right hand extended over the right leg. The weight of the upper body is rested on the left elbow whereas the arm extended in front the chest while the palm of the hand and the fingers are clearly carved as though she is holding an object.

Regardless to the scarceness of comparable terracotta figurines of banqueter theme from Lebanon, the banquet scenes and banqueters are found generously on stones and across periods. One of many, a well-known banqueting scene depicted on the long side of Ahiram sarcophagus45 from Byblos dated back to 850 B.C.; another familiar scene dated to about 430 B.C. shows a banqueter holding a huge horn cup in his right hand on the small side of Sarcophagus of Satrap of Sidon46 now in Istanbul Archeological Museum. Alternative scene from Saida is attested on a painted Funerary stelae of Robia47 in National Museum of Beirut who lived sometime from second to first century B.C.. Numerous banqueting scenes correspondingly with funerary iconography are verified on reliefs and sarcophagi from the roman period, hence these representations were mainly male banqueters accompanied by a female (reclined or seated at the end of the couch for example the sarcophagi from Tyre, Rachaya and Nebi Shit48) except of one unique banquet scene representing a female banqueter reclining on a high legged bed on the long side of a marble sarcophagus from Beirut49 on display in the National Museum of Beirut.

There is a major debate to the function of this terracotta banqueter’s (male/female). Many unanswered questions remain regarding the significant cult of their presence. These types of banqueters, which could be interpreted in a variety of ways, is more significant if it can be related to the specific context and associated material, which is unfortunately unknown for this group. Some indications point to its interpretation as a cultic banquets designating to worship god and goddess, or heroized the dead or heroes, this depends on whether the terracotta is considered religious or funerary banquets50. Hence the veiling is indicative to special occasions and the polos considered as attribute to the mother goddesses and related to fertility cult, in Greek art, or worn by the cult devotees of both gender51. Whereas the mitra is also often worn by the wine god Dionysus and considered as a recurrent element in the iconography of deities involved in erotic scenes or passion scenes52, in addition to the attributes held by the banqueters especially cups, patera and both are related to libation; It is therefore most probably these representations of female banqueters can belong to either divinities or mortal women as devotees, priestess participating in ritual symposia;

Conclusion

At the end of this reading we must take note to the diversity of these figurines in their style and fabric despite they belong to the same type. In consequence these figurines assemble a combination of inspired regional iconography. The assessment of the terracotta to the geographical area is based on stylistic and clay analysis, regardless of no clay analysis according to fabric color (especially the reclining figures) we can doubt about the Egyptian coroplastic center theory; it is nearly impossible to link these figurines to specific coroplastic centers with the wide circulation of the molds, typologies and figures among ancient production centers. What is more interesting is the rareness of terracotta reclining figures comparisons from Egypt except from one terracotta figurine from Memphis from the collection of Fouquet representing a female reclining on a high four legged bed, and probably referred as Isis, and was related to sacred meal ritual53, in spite of that this theme was well known in Egypt since the half of the third millennium B.C. and attested frequently on many funerary steles. The iconographical and stylistic analysis of these figures shows a combination of influences, styles and techniques from different centers, a clay analysis is the affirmative answer related to production centers to know whether these pieces were taken from their origin country and purchased by antiquity dealers in Beirut where Asensi bought them, or if these pieces were imported from ancient times and subsequently used by locals.

Notes:

  • Laumonier 1921: 111.
  • Yanes 1995: 5.
  • Yanes 1995: 7.
  • Yanes 1995: 7.
  • Sanchez 1993: 362.
  • Yanes 1995: 5; Sanchez 1993: 362.
  • Pons 1997: 108, no
  • Laumonier 1921: 112 , no
  • Laumonier 1921: 112.
  • Pons 1997: 108, no 25.

11-         This figurine is noted under the inv. no 3849. in the Catalogue du terres-cuites du musée Archéologique du Madrid by Laumonier, A. 1921 (Paris).

  • Pons 1997: 107, no
  • Laumonier 1921: 112, no
  • Pons 1997: 108, no
  • Pons 1997: 108, no
  • Laumonier 1921: 112, no
  • Pons 1997: 108, no
  • Laumonier 1921: 112, no
  • Laumonier 1921: 112, no
  • Winter 1903: 207, no

21-         This figurine is noted under the inv. no 3847, in the Catalogue du terres-cuites du musée Archéologique du Madrid by Laumonier, A. 1921 (Paris).

  • Laumonier 1921: 112, no
  • Laumonier 1921: 112, no

24-                                                                                               The earliest banquet scene is attested in Mesopotamia in Assyrian art, while the oldest terracotta production centers was in Southern Ionia, perhaps Samos or Miletus in second half of the sixth century B.C., for the origin and history of banquets and banqueters, see, J.-M.  Dentzer, Le motif du banquet couché dans le Proche-Orient et le monde grec du VIIe au IVe siècle avant J.-C., (Rome, 1982); Balty, Greenberg 2004: 215-297; Langin-Hooper 2007: 152;25-                                                                                               The reclining figurine from Mesopotamia can be nude, fully or partly wrapped; for the reclining figurines in Mesopotamia, see E.D.V. Buren, Clay figurines of Babylonia and Assyria 16 (Great Britain, 1930); W. Ingen, Figurines from Seleucia on the Tigris: discovered by the expeditions conducted by the University of Michigan with the cooperation of the Toledo Museum of Art and the Cleveland Museum of Art, 1927-1932, (Ann Harbor, 1939); K, Karvonen-Kannas, The Seleucid and Parthian terracotta figurines from Babylon: in the Iraq Museum, the British Museum and the Louvre ( Firenze, 1995); S. Langin-Hooper, Figurines in Hellenistic Babylonia: Miniaturization and Cultural Hybridity (Cambridge, 2020). Langin-Hooper 2007: 152; Heuzey1883: 3, Figs 2-4, Pl. 3 no 2, 3, 4; 26-                                                                                                Heuzey 1883: 3, Pl. 3, Fig. 3.

  • For comparison, see Evans, Kevorkain 2000: 118, Fig. 90;
  • Besques 1954: 61, Pl. XLII, B401-B404, 63, Pl. XLIII, B415-B416; Ferruzza 2016: 215, Fig. 1, 216, Fig. 7.
  • Besques 1954: 33, Pl. XXIV, B190, 47, Pl. XXXII, B293-B293.
  • Bencze 2010: 25-41;
  • Doumet-Serhal, et al., 1998: 145, 188, no 94; Gatier 2005: 77-89;
  • Benda-Weber 2014: 96.
  • Müller 1915: 81-84; Ridgway 1993: 173-Nr 4.65; Şare-Ağtürk 2014: 51.
  • For banqueter with polos, see Davidson 1952: 36, nos 164-165, 37, nos 171, 177, Pl. 12, 48, nos 301, 303, Pl. 25; Stillwell 1952: 104-112, Pls. 18, nos xiv,3 , 5, 19-23, no xiv, 25.
  • Richardson 1989: 215; Robinson 1906: 168-170, Pl. XII, 20;
  • Legrain 1930: no B9122; Langin-Hooper 2020: 239, Fig. 5.19a, b.
  • Benda-Weber 2014: 104-105.
  • Ingen 1939: 159, no 687, Pl. XLV, 325.
  • Mollet 1987: 256.
  • Benda-Weber 2014: 99-100, Fig. 3.
  • The AUB, from Rouvier Collection represents a fully dapped male figure representing a reclining banqueter in frontal position. He lies upon a couch, supporting himself upon his left elbow. His left forearm is raised towards his chest; he holds an animal (perhaps a goat) in his left hand. The right arm is extended inward towards the left leg; he is holding a horn cup perhaps a rhyton in his right hand. The legs are extended. The head is covered with a diadem. The hair is finely grooved over the forehead and over the ears. The face is ovoid, the eyes, nose and mouth can be clearly seen. He is wearing a long pleated chiton with a high round neck and long sleeves. The pleats are vertical on the chest. The himation drapes over the shoulders and wraps the upper body as diagonal pleats can be seen on the sleeves and around the waist. The feet can be seen as a protrusion from the long chiton.

For this figurine see, N. Khadra, 2021: The Terracotta Figurines from the J. Rouvier Collection at the American University of Beirut Archaeological Museum (AUB).

  • For the handmade male banqueters, see Stillwell 1952: 54-55, Pl. 8; -M. Kingsley, The terracottas of the Tarantine Greeks (The J. Paul Getty Museum 1976). For mold made banqueter, see Walters 1903: 61, no A403, 91, no B113, 117, nos B262-263, 147, nos B452-455, C540, 374, no D460, 375, no D467; Breitenstein 1941:26, no 248, Pl. 26, 41 no 370, Pl. 44, 71, no 669, Pl. 82; Davidson 1952: 16, no 15,18, 35, nos 154-159, Pl. 11, 36, 37, nos 171-177, Pl. 12, 47, nos 291-296, Pl. 24-25, 48, Pl. 25-26, 49, no 307, Pl.26; Higgins 1954: 313, no 1155, Pl. 158; Besques 1954: 61, nos B401-B404, 62-65, nos B433-435, Pl. XLII,XLIII, 83, nos C7, Pl. LVI, 95, nos C70-C71, Pl. LXVII; Invernizzi 1970-1971: 325-389; Ghirshman 1962a  :106, Fig.121b; Curtis 1989: 60, Fig. 72;  Merker 2000: 65-68, 106, nos C210-213, 107,108, nos C224-C226, Pls. 18-19; Merker 2003: 223-345;Curtis 2000b: Pl.7; Messina 2007a:  183, 185, cat.101; Bencze 2010: 25-41; Tolun 2015: 375-383; Karageorghis, V.  Merker, G.S. Mertens, J.R. 2016: 194, cat. 327; Ferruzza 2016: 51, 67, 77–78, 215, Fig. 1, 216, Figs. 4,7, 217, no 59, 218, no 121; For reclining figurines molds, see Stillwell 1948: 84-85,105 nos 56-60, Pls. 38-40 xiv13; Kingsley 1979: 201-220;
  • https://collections.louvre.fr/ark:/53355/cl010125527
  • https://collections.louvre.fr/ark:/53355/cl010149199
  • Dussaud 1930:164-187; Dentzer 1982:31-32, Fig. 26. For bibliography, see Dentzer 1982: 32n113.
  • Mendel 1912: 33-47; Dentzer 1982: 243, Fig. 184.
  • Jidejian 1971: 151.
  • For the sarcophagus from Tyre, see M. Chéhab, Sarcophages á reliefs de Tyr, Bulletin du Musée de Beyrouth 21 (Paris 1968); Chéhab, Fouilles de Tyr, la nécropole II, description des fouilles, Bulletin du Musée de Beyrouth 34 (Paris 1984); M. Chéhab, Fouilles de Tyr, la nécropole III, description des fouilles, Bulletin du Musée de Beyrouth 35 (Paris1985). For sarcophagus from Rachaya, see Z. Fani, Trois nouveaux exemples de banqueteurs, Bulletin d’Archéologie et d’Architecture Libanaise 12 (2008), p: 265-269. For sarcophagus  from Nebi Shit, see Z. Fani, Le sarcophage du Nebi Shit dans la région de l’Hermon, Tempora 16-17 (2005-2006.), p: 81- 98.
  • Koch 1982: 567, no
  • For the subject in general, see J. M. Dentzer, Le motif du banquet couché dans le Proche-Orient et le monde grec du VII au IV siècle avant J.C., Bibliothèque des écoles françaises d’Athènes et de Rome 246 (Rome, 1982).
  • Müller 1915: 81-84; Ridgway 1993: 173-Nr 4.65; Şare-Ağtürk 2014: 51;
  • Ferruzza 2016:156n7;
  • Perdrizet 1921: 119-120, no 322, Pl. C.

Bibliography1-    Balty, J., Greenberg, J.-K. 2004. Thesaurus Cultus Et Rituum Antiquorum (ThesCRA): purification, initiation, heroization, apotheosis, banquet, dance, music, cult images., J. Paul Getty museum eds., Los Angeles, California2-    Bencze, Á. 2010. «Symposia Tarentina. The artistic sources of the first Tarentine banqueter terracottas», BABesch 85: 25-41.3-    Benda-Weber, I. 2014. «Non-Greek headdresses In the Greek East», Tiarae, diadems and headdresses in the ancient Mediterranean cultures symbolism and technology, C. A. Giner, J. O. Garcia, M. A. Peset eds., Valencia.4-    Besques, S.-M. 1954. Catalogue raisonné des figurines et reliefs en terre-cuittes Grecs, Étrusques et Romain 1, Paris.5-    Besques, S.-M. 1963. Catalogue raisonné des figurines et reliefs en terre-cuittes Grecs et Romain 2, Paris.6-    Breitenstein, N. 1941. Catalogue of the Terracottas: Cypriote, Greek, Etrusco-Italian and Roman, Copenhagen.7-    Buren, E.D.V. 1930. Clay figurines of Babylonia and Assyria 16, Great Britain.8-    Cesnola, L.-P. di. 1894. A Descriptive Atlas of the Cesnola Collection of Cypriote Antiquities in The Metropolitan Museum of Art 2, New York.9-    Chéhab M., 1968. ‟Sarcophages á reliefs de Tyrˮ, Bulletin du Musée de Beyrouth 21.10-                                                   Chéhab M., 1984. ‟Fouilles de Tyr, la nécropole II, description des fouillesˮ, Bulletin du Musée de Beyrouth 34.11-                                                    Chéhab M., 1985. ‟Fouilles de Tyr, la nécropole III, description des fouillesˮ, Bulletin du Musée de Beyrouth 35.12-                                                   Curtis, E. 1989. Ancient Persia, London.13-                                                   Curtis, J. 2000b. Mesopotamia and Iran in the Parthian and Sasanian Periods: Rejection and Revival c. 238 BC – AD 642 (Proceedings of a Seminar in memory of Vladimir G. Lukonin), British Museum, London.14-                                                   Davidson, R.-G. 1952. The minor objects, Corinth results of excavations conducted by the American school of classical studies at athen: 12.15-                                                                                                      Dentzer, J.-M. 1982. Le motif du banquet couché dans le Proche-Orient et le monde grec du VIIe au IVe siècle avant J.-C., Rome.16-                                                   Doumet-Serhal, et al., 1998. Stones and creed, 100 artefacts from Lebanon’s antiquity, Beirut.17-                                                   Dussaud, R. 1930. «Les quatre campagnes de fouilles de M. Pierre Montet à Byblos», Syria 11/2: 164-187. 18-                                                   Evan J.M., Kevorkian H., 2000. The year one, art of the ancient world East and West, ed. E.J. Milleker, the Metropolitan Museum of Art, New York.19-                                                   Fani Z., 2005-2006. ‟Le sarcophage du Nebi Shit dans la région de l’Hermonˮ, Tempora 16-17: 81- 98.20-                                                   Fani, Z. 2008. «Trois nouveaux exemples de banqueteurs», BAAL 12: 265- 272.21-                                                   Ferruzza, M. L. 2016. Ancient Terracottas from South Italy and Sicily in the J. Paul Getty Museum, Los Angeles. 22-                                                   Gardner, E.-A. 1888.  Naukratis II, British Museum, London.23-                                                   Gatier, P.-L. 2005. «‟la, colonne de Qartaba” et la romanisation de la montagne libanaise, Aux pays d’Allat», Mélanges offerts à Michal Gawlikowski, éd. Bielinski P., Varsovie, Warszawski :77-97.24-                                                   Ghirshman, R. 1962a. Iran: Parthians and Sassanians, London.25-                                                   Heuzey, L. 1883Les figurines antiques de terre cuite du Musée du Louvre 1, Paris. 26-                                                   Higgins, R.-A. 1954. Catalogue of the Terracottas in the Department of Greek and Roman Antiquities 12, London.27-                                                   Ingen, W. 1939.  Figurines from Seleucia on the Tigris: discovered by the expeditions conducted by the University of Michigan with the cooperation of the Toledo Museum of Art and the Cleveland Museum of Art, 1927-1932,  Ann Harbor.28-                                                   Invernizzi, A. 1970-1971. «Problemi di coroplastica tardo-mesopotamica», Mesopotamia 5-6: 325-389.29-                                                   Jidejian, N. 1971. Sidon through the ages, Beyrouth.30-                                                   Karageorghis, V., Merker, G.-S., Mertens, J.-R. 2016. The Cesnola collection of Cypriot art: Terracottas, the Metropolitan, Museum of Art, New York.31-                                                   Karvonen-Kannas, K. 1995. The Seleucid and Parthian terracotta figurines from Babylon: in the Iraq Museum, the British Museum and the Louvre, Firenze. 32-                                                   Kingsley, B.-M. 1976. The terracottas of the Tarantine Greeks, The J. Paul Getty Museum.33-                                                   Kingsley, B.-M. 1979.  «The reclining Heroes of Taras and their cult and their cult», California Studies in Classical Antiquity 12: 201-220.34-                                                   Koch G., Sichtermann H., 1982. Romischen Sarkophagen, Munich35-                                                   Langin-Hooper, S.-M. 2007. «Social networks and cross cultural interaction: a new interpretation of the female terracotta figurines of Hellenistic Babylon», Oxford Journal of Archeology 26/2:145-165.36-                                                   Langin-Hooper, S.-M. 2020. Figurines in Hellenistic Babylonia: Miniaturization and Cultural Hybridity, Cambridge.37-                                                   Laumonier, A. 1921. Catalogue du terres-cuites du musée Archéologique du Madrid, Paris.38-                                                   Legrain, L. 1930Terra-cottas from Nippur 16, Philadelphia. 39-                                                   Mendel G., 1912. Catalogue des sculptures grecques, romaines et byzantines, 1, Constantinople.40-                                                   Merker, G.-S. 2000. «The sanctuary of Demeter and Kore: terracotta figurines of the Classical, Hellenistic, and Roman periods», Corinth results of excavations conducted by the American school of classical studies at Athens 17/4.41-                                                   Merker, G.-S. 2003. « Corinthian Terracotta Figurines: The Development of an Industry», Corinth results of excavations conducted by the American school of classical studies at Athens 20: 233-245.  42-                                                   Messina, V. 2007a. Sulla via di Alessandro da Seleucia al Gandhara, Torino. 43-                                                   Mollet J.-W., 1987. An illustrated dictionary of antique art and archeology, London.44-                                                   Müller, V.-K. 1915. Der polos: die griechische götterkron, University of Michigan.  45-                                                   Perdrizet, P. 1921. Les terres cuites grecques d’Égypte de la collection fouquet 1-2, France.46-                                                   Pons, E. 1997. «Conjunto de terracotas egipcias de época Greco-romana del Museo Arqueológico Nacional», Boletín del Museo Arqueológico Nacional 15 nos 1,2: 95-119. 47-                                                   Rada y Delgado, J. 1883. Catálogo del Museo Arqueológico Nacional, Madrid.48-                                                   Richardson, R.-B. 1898. «Terracottas from Corinth», A.J.A. 2, no 3/4: 202-222.   49-                                                   Richter, G. M. A.  1953. Handbook of the Greek Collection, Cambridge.50-                                                   Ridgway, B.-S. 1993. The Archaic Style in Greek Sculpture, The University of Michigan. 51-                                                   Robinson, D.M. 1906. «Terracottas from Corinth», A.J.A. 10/2: 159-173.   52-                                                   Sanchez, C.-G.  1993. «Colección Asensi», De gabinete a museo. Tres siglos de historiaMuseo Arqueológico Nacional: 362-367. 53-                                                   Şare-Ağtürk, T. 2014. «Headdress fashions and their social significance in ancient western Anatolia: the seventh through fourth centuries BCE», Anatolia 40: 45-85.   54-                                                   Stillwell, A.-N. 1948. The Potterrsʼ Quarter: the terracottas, Corinth results of excavations conducted by the American school of classical studies at Athens: 15/1.55-                                                   Stillwell, A.-N. 1952. The Potterrsʼ Quarter: the terracottas, Corinth results of excavations conducted by the American school of classical studies at Athens: 15/2.56-                                                   Tolun, V. 2015. «Terracotta figurines from the western Necropolis of Assos», Figurines de terre cuite en Méditerranée grecque et romain 2, iconographie et contextes: 375-383.57-                                                   Villing, A., et al.  2013-2015. Naukratis: Greeks in Egypt, British Museum, London.58-                                                   Walters, H.-B. 1903 .Catalogue of the terracottas in the department of Greek and Roman Antiquities British Museum, London.59-                                                   Winter, F. 1903. Die Typen der figürlichen Terrakotten 1, Berlin and Stuttgart. 60-                                                   Yanes, C.-P. 1995. «Don Tomas de Asensi: Historia de una Vida y de una colección», Boletín del Museo Arqueológico Nacional 13 (1-2): 5-11. 


[1]-Lebanese Archaeologist, PHD student. Preparing PHD at the Lebanese University (Doctoral School of Literature, Humanities and and Social Sciences), the dissertation titled “Local Roman Sarcophagus in Lebanon: Materials, Technics and Iconography” under the supervision of Dr. Zeina Fani Alpi.
Worked within the General Directorate of Antiquities team in Tyre- since 2008 till date Researcher and excavator. Email: samah.chahine@yahoo.com

– عالم آثار لبناني، طالب دكتوراه. تحضير رسالة الدكتوراه في الجامعة اللبنانية (كلية الدكتوراه في الآداب والعلوم الإنسانية والاجتماعية) بعنوان “التابوت الروماني المحلي في لبنان: المواد والتقنيات والأيقونية” بإشراف الدكتورة زينة فاني ألبي.عمل ضمن فريق المديرية العامة للآثار في صور – منذ العام 2008 وحتى تاريخه باحث ومنقب

اترك رد

لن يتم نشر عنوان بريدك الإلكتروني.

free porn https://evvivaporno.com/ website